187-215; Official citation: North Sea Continental Shelj", Jltdgment, I.C.J. Its decision ex aequo et bono, under the Reports 1969 Facts a. North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Federal Republic of Germany/Denmark, Federal Republic of Germany/Netherlands) I.C.J. This case has arisen due to differences concerning the delimitation of the areas of the continental shelf between the Parties. Introduction – Facts of the Case2 The North Sea Continental Shelf case was brought before the International Court of Justice by the Kingdom of Denmark, Federal Republic of Germany and Kingdom of Netherlands. Continental Shelf and North Sea Continental Shelf Case. North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (1969, ICJ Rep.).pdf from BOL 57 at University of Mindanao. The Legal Basis and the Definition of the Continental Shelf. NORTH SEA CONTINENTAL SHELF CASES (FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY/DENMARK; FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY/NETHERLANDS) SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE FOUAD AMMOUN 1. Academia.edu is a platform for academics to share research papers. These cases concerned the delimitation of the continental shelf of the North Sea as between Denmark and the Federal Republic of Germany, and as between the Netherlands and the Federal Republic, and were submitted to the Court by Special Agreement. They involved agreements among Denmark, Germany, and the Netherlands regarding the "delimitation" of areas—rich in oil and gas—of the continental shelf in the North Sea Official citation: North Sea Continental Shelj", Jltdgment, I.C.J. The International Court of Justice delivered judgment, by 11 votes to 6. b. BROWN, E.D., (1970), “The North Sea Continental Shelf Cases”. North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany/Denmark) Cases Previous Next Overview of the case Institution of proceedings Written proceedings Oral proceedings Other documents Orders Judgments Summaries of Judgments and Orders Press releases Correspondence See other cases involving Germany Denmark Proceedings joined with North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of … The International Court of Justice, for the first time, has the occasion to determine the adequacy of the rule enshrined in Article 6 in the North Sea Continental Shelf case. North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany/Netherlands) Cases Previous Next Overview of the case Institution of proceedings Current Legal Problems, Vol. The Court delivered judgment, by 11 votes to 6, in the North Sea Continental Shelf cases. North Sea Continental Shelf Case, ICJ reports, 1969 FACTS: • On December 1, 1964, the Federal Republic of Germany and the Netherlands concluded an agreement for … The North Sea Continental Shelf Cases: Landmark or High Watermark? Both Denmark and the Netherlands submitted an individual dispute with Germany to the ICJ involving claims to the North Sea Continental Shelf. 23, pp. North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (1969, ICJ Rep.).pdf from BOL 57 at University of Mindanao. Germany v Denmark and the Netherlands [1969] ICJ 1 (also known as The North Sea Continental Shelf cases) were a series of disputes that came to the International Court of Justice in 1969. This case, which was submitted to the Court in 1982 by Special Agreement between Libya and Malta, related to the delimitation of the areas of continental shelf appertaining to each of these two States. Rule not proposed by International Law Commission as an emerging rule of customary international law, it has not crystallized as a rule •3. Whether the equidistance principle is a rule of customary international law •2. This paper reflects the ICJ’s notable decision in not laying any applicable principle and rules of international law on the delimitation of the North Sea continental shelf between the disputing coastal states. The actual independent practice of States in cases of, e.g. 283-306, Eirik Bjorge and Cameron Miles, eds, Hart Publishing, 2017 Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. LANDMARK CASES IN PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW, pp. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Judgment of 20 February 1969. View Notes - 2. The dispute, which was submitted to the Court on 20 February 1967, related to the delimitation of the continental shelf between the Federal Republic of Germany and Denmark on the one hand, and between the Federal Republic of Germany and the Netherlands on the … In support of its argument, Libya relied on the principle of natural prolongation and the concept of proportionality. "North Sea Continental Shelf, Germany v Denmark, Merits, Judgment, (1969) ICJ Rep 3, ICGJ 150 (ICJ 1969), 20th February 1969, United Nations [UN]; International Court of Justice [ICJ]" published on by Oxford University Press. States can make reservations to Article 6 in the collective enforcement and humanitarian aid, was completely overlooked with subjective opinion juris nowhere to be seen. Reports 1969, p. 35/2017 Reports 1969, p. Read North Sea Continental Shelf Cases, ICJ (1969) paras 60-82 •1. View Notes - 2.