The Oil, Gas & Energy Law Intelligence (OGEL, ISSN 1875-418X) Journal and OGELFORUM listserv focus on recent developments in the area of oil, gas, energy law, regulation, treaties, judicial and arbitral cases, voluntary guidelines, tax and contracting, including the oil, gas, energy geopolitics. 241-255. Author: Dino Kritsiotis 1 View More View Less. [6 November 2003] ICJ 90 III. Contentious cases organized by incidental proceedings, States entitled to appear before the Court, States not members of the United Nations parties to the Statute, States not parties to the Statute to which the Court may be open, Declarations recognizing the jurisdiction of the Court as compulsory, Organs and agencies authorized to request advisory opinions, Series A: Collection of Judgments (1923-1930), Series B: Collection of Advisory Opinions (1923-1930), Series A/B: Collection of Judgments, Orders and Advisory Opinions (from 1931), Series C: Acts and documents relating to Judgments and Advisory Opinions given by the Court / Pleadings, Oral Arguments and Documents, Series D: Acts and Documents concerning the organization of the Court, Memorial submitted by the Islamic Republic of Iran, Counter-Memorial and Counter-claim submitted by the United States of America, Request of Iran for Hearing in Relation to the United States' Counter-claim Pursuant to Article 80 (3) of the Rules of Court, Views on Iran's ''Request for Hearing in Relation to the United States' Counter-claim pursuant to Article 80 (3) of the Rules of Court'' submitted by the United States of America, Reply and Defence to Counter-claim submitted by the Islamic Republic of Iran, Rejoinder submitted by the United States of America, Further Response to the United States of America Counter-claim submitted by the Islamic Republic of Iran, Corrigendum submitted by the United States of America, Documents submitted by United States of America after the Closure of the Written Proceedings: Expert Report and Diplomatic Note from the Royal Norwegian Embassy in Washington D.C. to the United States Department of State, Documents submitted by Iran after the Closure of the Written Proceedings: Comments of an Expert of Iran on the Expert Report of the United States of America, Written Replies of the Parties to Questions put by Judges during the Oral Proceedings and Observations submitted by the Parties on Replies, Dissenting opinion by Judge ad hoc Rigaux (translation), Declaration of Vice-President Ranjeva (translation), Separate Opinion of Judge Parra-Aranguren, Separate Opinion of Judge ad hoc Rigaux (translation). Contentious cases organized by incidental proceedings, States entitled to appear before the Court, States not members of the United Nations parties to the Statute, States not parties to the Statute to which the Court may be open, Declarations recognizing the jurisdiction of the Court as compulsory, Organs and agencies authorized to request advisory opinions, Series A: Collection of Judgments (1923-1930), Series B: Collection of Advisory Opinions (1923-1930), Series A/B: Collection of Judgments, Orders and Advisory Opinions (from 1931), Series C: Acts and documents relating to Judgments and Advisory Opinions given by the Court / Pleadings, Oral Arguments and Documents, Series D: Acts and Documents concerning the organization of the Court, Dissenting opinion by Judge ad hoc Rigaux (translation). Garwood-Gowers, Andrew (2004) Case Concerning Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v United States of America): Did the ICJ Miss the Boat on the Law on the Use of Force? Overview of the case On 2 November 1992, the Islamic Republic of Iran filed in the Registry of the Court an Application instituting proceedings against the United States of America with respect to the destruction of Iranian oil platforms. ŸêdÁ‡$IÄÁsD ×;:†‚EÌæ Ç€t1ƒ¤„JCmY‰Î¨VZ0:MJFzşş�nPnÌ´OÎ@7œô`Ç‘ØDçp:4Nu�\. Reports 1998, p. 269 Mode officiel de citation: Plates-formes pétrolières (République islamique d'Iran c. Etats-Unis d'Amérique), ordonnance du 26 mai 1998, C. I. J. Recueil 1998, p. 269 ISSN 0074-4441 ISBN 92- 1-070770-2 &kS"UlllbW 706 Preliminary Objections submitted by the Islamic Republic of Iran, Written answers of the Islamic Republic of Iran to questions Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote. Contentious cases organized by incidental proceedings, States entitled to appear before the Court, States not members of the United Nations parties to the Statute, States not parties to the Statute to which the Court may be open, Declarations recognizing the jurisdiction of the Court as compulsory, Organs and agencies authorized to request advisory opinions, Series A: Collection of Judgments (1923-1930), Series B: Collection of Advisory Opinions (1923-1930), Series A/B: Collection of Judgments, Orders and Advisory Opinions (from 1931), Series C: Acts and documents relating to Judgments and Advisory Opinions given by the Court / Pleadings, Oral Arguments and Documents, Series D: Acts and Documents concerning the organization of the Court, Preliminary Objection submitted by the United States of America, Observations and Submissions on the U.S. Conclusion of the public hearings International Court of Justice 2017-2020 – All rights reserved. 7 March 2003 Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America) Conclusion of the public hearings Court ready to begin its deliberation THE HAGUE, 7 March 2003. THE HAGUE, 7 March 2003. start its deliberation. Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America) - Counter-claims. Access to OGEL Journal articles (well over 3000 articles in total for Premium account holders), Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents), OGELFORUM membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international oil, gas and energy community), "Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v United States of America) - Conclusion of the public hearings - Court ready to begin its deliberation International Court of Justice" put by Members of the Court, Written answers of the United States of America to questions put by Judges, Comments of Iran on the answer given by the United States to the question put by Judge Higgins, Separate Opinion of Judge Ranjeva (translation), Separate Opinion of Judge Parra-Aranguren, Separate Opinion of Judge ad hoc Rigaux (translation), Dissenting Opinion of Vice-President Schwebel. OGEL 3 (2003), www.ogel.org Oil Platforms (Iran v. U.S.), 2003 I.C.J. 7 March 2003 ... Iran, Islamic Republic of United States of America See other cases involving Preliminary objections Counter-claims Orders Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America). Current Members. © URL: www.ogel.org/article.asp?key=481, Dr. Maria R. Mazzanti and Giacomo Luciani, Dr. C. Kelly, Dr. M. Wüstenberg, Dr. S.L. "The United States of America requests that the Court uphold the objection of the United States to the jurisdiction of the Court in the case concerning Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America)." Counter-claims | Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America) - Counter-claims © 161 (Nov. 6) Represented By: Iran: Mr. M. H. Zahedin-Labbaf, Agent of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, Deputy Director for Legal Affairs, Bureau of International Legal Services of the Islamic Republic of Iran, The Hague, as Agent; I. © Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America) Cases Previous Next Overview of the case Institution of proceedings Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America), which Read our Terms & Conditions here, and our Privacy Policy here. Simply fill in the registration form to start your trial membership. Case Concerning Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America) II. On behalf of the Government of Iran, at the hearing of 24 September 1996: Want to join OGELFORUM, our unique platform for oil, gas and energy issues? Reports 2003, p. 161 IV. 1 Iran brought an action against the United States of America concerning two attacks by US armed forces destroying a number of Iranian oil production installations in the Persian Gulf which occurred during the armed conflict between Iraq and Iran (1980–88). opened on 17 February 2003, were concluded today. on the merits in the Case concerning Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v United States of America).1 The decision, handed down more than 10 years after Iran initiated proceedings, brought to a close a series of disputes between Iran and the US.2 Arising out of the US attacks on Iranian oil platforms … The Court will now Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America) - Preliminary objections Article from: OGEL 3 (2003), in Cases & Commentaries. International Court of Justice 2017-2020 – All rights reserved. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 5(1), pp. The public hearings in the case concerning Oil Case Concerning Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America), Judgment, I.C.J. Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America) - Preliminary objections. On behalf of the Government of Iran, at the hearing of 24 September 1996: Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America) Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America) - Preliminary objections Court ready to begin its deliberation Case Concerning Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America) In: The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law. 90: Cite as: Case Concerning Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. International Court of Justice 2017-2020 – All rights reserved.